Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-reproducibility in workflow 17034.0 inHLT/TAU/PFTaus DQM folder #47211

Open
makortel opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 9 comments
Open

Non-reproducibility in workflow 17034.0 inHLT/TAU/PFTaus DQM folder #47211

makortel opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 9 comments

Comments

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

DQM comparisons of workflow 17034.0 showed differences in a purely technical PR (#47175 (comment)) in HLT/TAU/PFTaus

Image

and in HLT/TAU/PFTaus/Summary/PathTriggerBits

Image

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign hlt

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: hlt

@Martin-Grunewald,@mmusich you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 30, 2025

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @makortel.

@Dr15Jones, @antoniovilela, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I didn't see these differences in any other PR test on CMSSW_15_0_X_2025-01-29-1100 IB, so I can't tell yet if this was some weird one-time glitch or something more frequent.

@makortel makortel changed the title Non-reproducibility in workflow 17034.0 Non-reproducibility in workflow 17034.0 inHLT/TAU/PFTaus DQM folder Jan 30, 2025
@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 30, 2025

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 30, 2025

assign dqm

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: dqm

@antoniovagnerini,@rseidita you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Occurred in #47227 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants