Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document what's missing in containerd-for-processes #201

Open
gcapizzi opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Document what's missing in containerd-for-processes #201

gcapizzi opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@MarcPaquette
Labels
architecture docs

Comments

@gcapizzi
Copy link
Contributor

gcapizzi commented Jul 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

While our containerd-for-processes mode is good enough to run Cloud Foundry, it doesn't implement the full Garden API yet. Let's make sure this is clearly documented and list the features that are still missing.

We might also want to revisit this sentence:

At time of writing, we have confidence that containerd-for-processes mode is production ready

by specifying that we mean "in Cloud Foundry".
@gcapizzi gcapizzi changed the title Document what's missing in containerd without processes Document what's missing in containerd-for-processes Jul 19, 2021
@MarcPaquette
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gcapizzi,
What are the next steps on this issue?

Thanks,
Marc

@MarcPaquette MarcPaquette moved this from Inbox to Waiting for Changes | Open for Contribution in Application Runtime Platform Working Group Mar 27, 2024
@MarcPaquette MarcPaquette self-assigned this Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MarcPaquette MarcPaquette

Labels
architecture docs
Projects
Application Runtime Platform Working Group
Status: Waiting for Changes | Open for Contribution
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gcapizzi @MarcPaquette