We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Looking at PinDelay, it currently refers to bel pins via BelPinIdx: https://github.com/SymbiFlow/fpga-interchange-schema/blob/78abf3f30770ccc6d0e1f5dbfeaef2666f55acf6/interchange/DeviceResources.capnp#L635
PinDelay
BelPinIdx
BelPinIdx is not unique per bel, but per site, and as a bel pin mapping rule that PinDelay is associated with can refer to more than one bel in a site: https://github.com/SymbiFlow/fpga-interchange-schema/blob/78abf3f30770ccc6d0e1f5dbfeaef2666f55acf6/interchange/DeviceResources.capnp#L388 but BelPinIdx can only ever apply to a single bel in a site.
To avoid a lot more duplication of rules than we have currently, which is also likely to slow down the place and route, I think the delay should use StringIdx names for bel pins, like the bel-cell mapping rules themselves: https://github.com/SymbiFlow/fpga-interchange-schema/blob/78abf3f30770ccc6d0e1f5dbfeaef2666f55acf6/interchange/DeviceResources.capnp#L382
StringIdx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Looking at
PinDelay
, it currently refers to bel pins viaBelPinIdx
: https://github.com/SymbiFlow/fpga-interchange-schema/blob/78abf3f30770ccc6d0e1f5dbfeaef2666f55acf6/interchange/DeviceResources.capnp#L635BelPinIdx
is not unique per bel, but per site, and as a bel pin mapping rule thatPinDelay
is associated with can refer to more than one bel in a site: https://github.com/SymbiFlow/fpga-interchange-schema/blob/78abf3f30770ccc6d0e1f5dbfeaef2666f55acf6/interchange/DeviceResources.capnp#L388but
BelPinIdx
can only ever apply to a single bel in a site.To avoid a lot more duplication of rules than we have currently, which is also likely to slow down the place and route, I think the delay should use
StringIdx
names for bel pins, like the bel-cell mapping rules themselves: https://github.com/SymbiFlow/fpga-interchange-schema/blob/78abf3f30770ccc6d0e1f5dbfeaef2666f55acf6/interchange/DeviceResources.capnp#L382The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: