You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have the first pieces of code ready to be put into this repo. Should we push directly to master or follow the master/development/branches model of the main repo? Should we have some review process in place, or simply push? I'd be interesting in hearing thoughts, I don't want to push to master until that has been decided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I should add that my current thinking is that we should have some sort of review process in place, not as thorough as for the main repo, but perhaps we should create pull requests so that those interested can take a look before it gets merged, and assuming no one raises concerns within a week, the author him or herself can then merge (so that things don't get held up for multiple weeks due to lack of code reviewers).
I have the first pieces of code ready to be put into this repo. Should we push directly to master or follow the master/development/branches model of the main repo? Should we have some review process in place, or simply push? I'd be interesting in hearing thoughts, I don't want to push to master until that has been decided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: