Skip to content

Future Plans? #37

Answered by cpq
sfranzyshen asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yeah, small size and simplicity takes the highest priority.
Elk implements a very minimum required to have an ability to script.
Adding more features is a never ending process and arguments about what is useful vs what is not.
Elk is going to be expanded only if there is a very obvious use case, on a real-life embedded example, where a feature is missing, and it is impossible or very hard to implement a functionality using an existing set of features.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by cpq
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants