You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"No. CSS won't interfere with the way assistive technologies understand content on a page. However, it is still encourage to do so."
The thing is, CSS validation can catch syntax errors and missing foreground/background colours. Properly-working CSS in required for a bunch of success criteria.
Finding errors inside media queries for other viewports is pretty handy, since (assuming they're visible) you'd only otherwise spot the errors if you test a different viewport at the problem view.
Edit: CSS validation will point out missing foreground/background colours (see Failure F24).
IDRC's old achecker tool provides CSS validation results along with the a11y errors, warnings, and HTML validation. Its CSS validation is currently down.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"No. CSS won't interfere with the way assistive technologies understand content on a page. However, it is still encourage to do so."
The thing is, CSS validation can catch syntax errors and missing foreground/background colours. Properly-working CSS in required for a bunch of success criteria.
Finding errors inside media queries for other viewports is pretty handy, since (assuming they're visible) you'd only otherwise spot the errors if you test a different viewport at the problem view.
Edit: CSS validation will point out missing foreground/background colours (see Failure F24).
IDRC's old achecker tool provides CSS validation results along with the a11y errors, warnings, and HTML validation. Its CSS validation is currently down.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: