Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2019. It is now read-only.

Not compatible with e10s #27

Open
rugk opened this issue Sep 8, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Not compatible with e10s #27

rugk opened this issue Sep 8, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rugk
Copy link
Contributor

rugk commented Sep 8, 2016

Is this add-on compatible with Electrolysis (e10s)? Electrolysis is the new architecture of Firefox and Mozilla already rolls out some stable Firefox versions with e10s enabled.

More information:


According to ACR this add-on is not compatible with e10s.

@catholicon
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the report @rugk. I hadn't explicitly checked ACR. The add-on, btw, has been working fine on my latest release build installation. I'd check why ACR doesn't think so and update if required.

@rugk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rugk commented Sep 8, 2016

You have to update your manifest file if you want ACR to say "Add-on is compatible with e10s".

@catholicon catholicon self-assigned this Sep 8, 2016
@catholicon
Copy link
Owner

catholicon commented Sep 24, 2016

So, finally I got around to check e10s out. And, it turns out that we use sdk/selection API (to show QR for selection) which doesn't quite work yet as mentioned here :(. I've cc'ed myself to this issue but I think migrating to web-extension might be a better long term solution.

@rugk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rugk commented May 12, 2018

BTW I've created a WebExtension QR code add-on for modern Firefox versions, and it soon also supports generating QR codes from a selection. See #29 (comment).

@catholicon
Copy link
Owner

@rugk, since I'm clearly unable to maintain my extension, I'd be happy to put out a link for you extension in this repo (amo page for my addon isn't usable anyway now). Would that be okay?

@rugk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rugk commented May 12, 2018

Sure, that would be glad. 😃

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants