Proposal : Building tarred bundles without being dependent on a OCI registry #692
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for carvel ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
100mik
reviewed
Oct 10, 2023
ashpect
changed the title
proposals/repo-to-tar/README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| #### imgpkg | ||
| imgpkg save command will be added to imgpkg. This command will create a tar file from the bundle image. The command will be used as follows : <br> | ||
| `imgpkg save -f examples/basic-step-2 --to-tar /tmp/my-image.tar`<br> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the proposed UX in this comment carvel-dev/imgpkg#55 (comment). It is more in line with the rest of the commands that we already have in imgpkg.
For this proposal, we could also mention the idea of "inflating" the bundle with all the associated images, nevertheless, I do not think this is a priority to be implemented, but it would be good to have the proposal for it approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've looked at the comment and also modified the proposal based on our slack conversation.
I've added the inflate option in the future goals as well explaining it briefly.
ashpect
force-pushed
the
develop
branch
3 times, most recently
from
eaf7a2e
to
0171447
Compare
|
|
||
| ### Other Approaches Considered | ||
|
|
||
| The idea behind the usage of `imgpkg push -b my.registry.io/some-name -f some-folder --to-oci-tar local-oci-format.tar` is to concentrate in a single command all the options to create a new image, that being to the registry or directly to disk. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ashpect @joaopapereira I was curious if we have a real use case for this? Since we have a --tar flag in imgpkg copy, it makes sense to add --oci-tar flag to it, but we don't have a --to-tar in imgpkg push so I was thinking if we should add the --to-oci-tar flag or not.
cc @100mik
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- The --to-oci-tar flag for the imgpkg push will create a oci spec tar file from the bundle image. The command will be used as follows :
imgpkg push -b registry.example.com/xyz -f some-folder --to-oci-tar local-oci-format.tar - Making copy also save bundle to disk was not consistent with the already existing commands of copy where a registry is involved for copying to. If someone just wants to create a oci tar spec from bundle, with push it looked more in touch with existing commands.
- https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CH8KCCKA5/p1697895845820659?thread_ts=1697604738.773009&cid=CH8KCCKA5 (Some conversation for the thought process regarding the save and push commands)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My main concern with this is that the -b option is required (because we want to add labels if it is bundle), and because of that the first issue that we are trying to solve in this problem still remains ("Dependent on using a registry to create a tar file from a bundle image.")
proposals/repo-to-tar/README.md
Outdated
| ``` | ||
| where one of the files in sha256 is the actual file tar and others 2 are configs and manifests.<br> | ||
|
|
||
| 2. Add functionality to `imgpkg save` to create and persist a oci tar file mentioned in point 1 which in turn is compatible with `imgpkg copy` command.<br> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I said above I think we can skip this goal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed the save command from the proposal.
Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
* Proposal - Signatures for Carvel Artifacts Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Update proposal metadata Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Improve formatting Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Update proposal status Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Improve proposal after review Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Refined proposal for binaries + examples Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Fix typo Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Introduce changes to Carvel GH Action Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> * Update proposal status to 'accepted' Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Thomas Vitale <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fritz Durchardt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fritz Duchardt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fritz Duchardt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joao Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
…arvel-dev#690) * add optional flag in git configuration to skip ssl verification Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> * update flag name to dangerousSkipTLSVerify Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
* add optional flag in git configuration to skip SSL/TLS verification (carvel-dev#690) * add optional flag in git configuration to skip ssl verification Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> * update flag name to dangerousSkipTLSVerify Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: renuy <[email protected]> * RoadMap update October 2023 Signed-off-by: renuy <[email protected]> * roadmap Signed-off-by: renuy <[email protected]> * Adding kcrtl items to roadmap Signed-off-by: renuy <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: renuy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Varsha Munishwar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: renuy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Revert unintended change from carvel-dev#676 Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joao Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joao Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joao Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Add approvers Co-authored-by: João Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: João Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: João Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: João Pereira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ashpect <[email protected]>
|
@ashpect , |
|
Should we close this PR since looks like we have a newer one? |
|
Yes, Please feel free to close this pr. The new pr is here |
|
Closing PR since we have a newer one |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.