Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Server not showing in LAN tab in client #431

Open
UsmanTariq2 opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[BUG] Server not showing in LAN tab in client #431

UsmanTariq2 opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@UsmanTariq2
Copy link

UsmanTariq2 commented Jun 27, 2024

Hello,
i have a simple server setup with my LAN subnet 192.168.1.100:28965 . "in CMD +set net_ip 192.168.1.100"

Using the same PC ( windows ) i go to the LAN tab in my section but i cannot see my server

Now i set server with "+set net_ip". Now the server binds to 0.0.0.0
Now i go to client and i can see my server in the local tab.

When i connect, it is using a different subnet to my LAN, something like 192.168.56.1:28961
Not sure this is a client or serverside issue.

Secondly, i would like ipv6 ULA to come into play here . If additionally binded to a ULA address, the server prefers ULA over ipv4 LAN

I would in general like ULA support extended, such as server awareness that ULA cant be routed outside LAN. Server should not send ULA pings to the codx master server for example.

@AlexanderCurl
Copy link
Contributor

Can you provide some logs?
I don't think it is possible to bind to a completely different subnet other than what is actually used on a host, that just doesn't make any sense.
Are you using some kind of virtual machine for the server?
Also ULA issue, that is not an issue, as it will bind whatever IPv6 address will find. you can disable to +set net_ip6 ::01

@UsmanTariq2
Copy link
Author

Hello,

Will look into this in the future. Currently busy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants