You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Bazel ecosystem, our proto files are heavily commented.
Fields, Message, RPC comments often reference to other namespace with syntax like this:
// The action cache API is used to query whether a given action has already been
// performed and, if so, retrieve its result. Unlike the
// [ContentAddressableStorage][build.bazel.remote.execution.v2.ContentAddressableStorage],
// which addresses blobs by their own content, the action cache addresses the
// [ActionResult][build.bazel.remote.execution.v2.ActionResult] by a
// digest of the encoded [Action][build.bazel.remote.execution.v2.Action]
// which produced them.
// ...
service ActionCache {
...
}
is it possible to render these references properly in Buf's module documentation?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
In the Bazel ecosystem, our proto files are heavily commented.
Fields, Message, RPC comments often reference to other namespace with syntax like this:
is it possible to render these references properly in Buf's module documentation?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions