You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have some questions regarding EcoliTox/RetroPathRL.
My aim is to predict the toxicity of some compounds, and to achieve this, I want to modify RetroPathRL to accept a list of compounds and return their potential toxicity.
I modified 'calculate_organisms.py' and used the 'import_organism_from_csv()' function to input my list of compounds. My list of compounds follows a format similar to the CSV sink files.
However, when I run the program multiple times, the model selected between other_MLP, big_MLP, medium_MLP, and small_MLP varies significantly (with a distribution of 15%/32%/38%/16% over 1000 executions). I'm unsure if the model selection should remain relatively consistent or if such variation is expected. Additionally, the toxicity values fluctuate across executions; for instance, a compound may have a toxicity of -1 in one run, 0 in another, and -0.5 in another.
My question is: is it normal for the model selection to change with each execution? This seems to affect the toxicity values. Also, how should I interpret these toxicity values? For instance, should values between -1 and 0 be considered nearly non-toxic and treated accordingly?
Thank you in advance,
Quentin FERNANDEZ DE GRADO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I have some questions regarding EcoliTox/RetroPathRL.
My aim is to predict the toxicity of some compounds, and to achieve this, I want to modify RetroPathRL to accept a list of compounds and return their potential toxicity.
I modified 'calculate_organisms.py' and used the 'import_organism_from_csv()' function to input my list of compounds. My list of compounds follows a format similar to the CSV sink files.
However, when I run the program multiple times, the model selected between other_MLP, big_MLP, medium_MLP, and small_MLP varies significantly (with a distribution of 15%/32%/38%/16% over 1000 executions). I'm unsure if the model selection should remain relatively consistent or if such variation is expected. Additionally, the toxicity values fluctuate across executions; for instance, a compound may have a toxicity of -1 in one run, 0 in another, and -0.5 in another.
My question is: is it normal for the model selection to change with each execution? This seems to affect the toxicity values. Also, how should I interpret these toxicity values? For instance, should values between -1 and 0 be considered nearly non-toxic and treated accordingly?
Thank you in advance,
Quentin FERNANDEZ DE GRADO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: