Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential Mismatch between the MAF output mode and VCF output mode on Gencode V43 #9013

Open
jamesemery opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jamesemery
Copy link
Collaborator

While working on #9012 I tried to update the gencode v28 datasource snippets in the Funcotator integration tests to V43. In doing so I found that it broke the MAF vs. VCF output render tests with errors of the following nature:

java.lang.AssertionError: Failed Matching VCF and MAF fields:
	VCF (Gencode_43_variantClassification):   	RNA[0]	RNA[1]	RNA[2]	RNA[3]	RNA[4]	RNA[5]	RNA[6]	RNA[7]	RNA[8]	RNA[9]	RNA[10]
	MAF (Variant_Classification):             	LINCRNA[0]	LINCRNA[1]	LINCRNA[2]	LINCRNA[3]	LINCRNA[4]	LINCRNA[5]	LINCRNA[6]	LINCRNA[7]	LINCRNA[8]	LINCRNA[9]	LINCRNA[10]
----
	VCF (Gencode_43_otherTranscripts):   	[0]	[1]	[2]	[3]	[4]	[5]	[6]	[7]	[8]	[9]	[10]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK/PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_RNA[11]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK/PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_RNA[12]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK/PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_RNA[13]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_INTRON/PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK[14]	[48]	[49]	[50]	[51]	[52]	[53]	[54]	[55]	[56]	[57]	[58]	[59]	[60]	[61]	[62]	[63]	[64]	[65]	[66]	[67]	[68]	[69]	[70]	[71]	[72]	[73]	[74]	[75]	[76]	[77]	[78]	[79]	[80]	[81]	[82]	[83]	[84]	[85]	[86]	[87]	[88]	[89]	[90]	[91]	[92]	[93]	[94]	[95]	[96]	[97]	[98]	[99]	[100]	[101]	[102]	[103]
	MAF (Other_Transcripts):             	[0]	[1]	[2]	[3]	[4]	[5]	[6]	[7]	[8]	[9]	[10]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK|PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_LINCRNA[11]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK|PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_LINCRNA[12]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK|PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_LINCRNA[13]	PIK3CA_ENST00000643187.1_INTRON|PIK3CA-DT_ENST00000435560.1_FIVE_PRIME_FLANK[14]	[48]	[49]	[50]	[51]	[52]	[53]	[54]	[55]	[56]	[57]	[58]	[59]	[60]	[61]	[62]	[63]	[64]	[65]	[66]	[67]	[68]	[69]	[70]	[71]	[72]	[73]	[74]	[75]	[76]	[77]	[78]	[79]	[80]	[81]	[82]	[83]	[84]	[85]	[86]	[87]	[88]	[89]	[90]	[91]	[92]	[93]	[94]	[95]	[96]	[97]	[98]	[99]	[100]	[101]	[102]	[103]
----

Its unclear what is the most correct output rendering between the LINCRNA vs RNA for this specific transcript, its worth investigating and adding more robust gencodev43 tests to funcotator in case this is a real issue and not just a mismatch in the testing framework.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant