You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inside that Json object is an Organisation, which is the only thing I need to map.
Currently, I json_decode the response to test for errors and raise exceptions based on any error object. This means I have access to an organisation object already ($data->organisation).
I don't think re-json_encoding that Organisation object is the way forward, only to pass it to Json-Mapper to do it all again.
So from what I can see, I'm either petitioning for:
mapToObject() to be made public, so I can pass my object straight to it; or,
map() gets a new, nullable, argument that specifies the path to the object to map.
Am I seeing this from the wrong angle? All thoughts appreciated!
Edit: similar question, but for when an array of objects is returned.
Edit2: Would it be typical to leave json-mapper alone, and create a PHP object per API Response type?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What's the best way to map a nested json object?
Imagine this response shown here: https://stytch.com/docs/b2b/api/create-organization
Inside that Json object is an Organisation, which is the only thing I need to map.
Currently, I json_decode the response to test for errors and raise exceptions based on any error object. This means I have access to an organisation object already ($data->organisation).
I don't think re-json_encoding that Organisation object is the way forward, only to pass it to Json-Mapper to do it all again.
So from what I can see, I'm either petitioning for:
Am I seeing this from the wrong angle? All thoughts appreciated!
Edit: similar question, but for when an array of objects is returned.
Edit2: Would it be typical to leave json-mapper alone, and create a PHP object per API Response type?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: