You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The rule should detect the following modeling patterns
Sequence flows that are not outgoing from OR/XOR gateways should not have labels. Labeling these sequence flows can lead to confusion.
Instead either use no label, because the following activity speaks for itself, or an intermediate none event:
How does the rule improve the BPMN diagram?
Instead of having confusing labels on sequence flows that are not outgoing from OR/XOR gateways, they are either removed or replaced with an intermediate none event.
In Camunda, intermediate none events can be used for business intelligence in Optimize.
Rule Details
Name: no-isolated-sequence-flow-label
Default notification level: warn
What alternatives did you consider?
BPMN models continue to contain labels on sequence flows that are not outgoing from OR/XOR gateways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The rule should detect the following modeling patterns
Sequence flows that are not outgoing from OR/XOR gateways should not have labels. Labeling these sequence flows can lead to confusion.
Instead either use no label, because the following activity speaks for itself, or an intermediate none event:
How does the rule improve the BPMN diagram?
Instead of having confusing labels on sequence flows that are not outgoing from OR/XOR gateways, they are either removed or replaced with an intermediate none event.
In Camunda, intermediate none events can be used for business intelligence in Optimize.
Rule Details
warn
What alternatives did you consider?
BPMN models continue to contain labels on sequence flows that are not outgoing from OR/XOR gateways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: