You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Let's say I want to do a multicontinuation on new branches from a point at index id
bp = get_normal_form(br, id)
δp = 0.005
pred = predictor(bp, δp)
pts = BifurcationKit.get_first_points_on_branch(br, bp, pred, opts_br; δp)
I'm frequently encountering that my point gets misclassified as hopf when it's supposed to be nd and then get_first_points_on_branch throws a type error. Would it make sense to skip this type check? For me it'd be beneficial since I know the type of bifurcation and don't want to spend time changing parameters to get it properly detected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Let's say I want to do a multicontinuation on new branches from a point at index
id
I'm frequently encountering that my point gets misclassified as
hopf
when it's supposed to bend
and thenget_first_points_on_branch
throws a type error. Would it make sense to skip this type check? For me it'd be beneficial since I know the type of bifurcation and don't want to spend time changing parameters to get it properly detected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: