You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was trying to recreate the results of the new method in the paper when I got confused about the splits provided in the dataset. For example, the SS-Youtube dataset is said to have 1000 training samples and 1142 test samples in Table 4 of the paper. However, the splits that are given in the raw.pickle file of the dataset result in a split of 800 training, 100 validation, and 1242 test samples. Does this imply a change in splits in any case or is there a typo in the paper?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I was trying to recreate the results of the
new
method in the paper when I got confused about the splits provided in the dataset. For example, the SS-Youtube dataset is said to have 1000 training samples and 1142 test samples in Table 4 of the paper. However, the splits that are given in the raw.pickle file of the dataset result in a split of 800 training, 100 validation, and 1242 test samples. Does this imply a change in splits in any case or is there a typo in the paper?Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: