We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There is a better mantained fork of ltex-ls: https://github.com/ltex-plus/ltex-ls-plus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, sounds good. I won't promise to implement any time soon though.
Couple of links to my future me
Sorry, something went wrong.
The first change would probably be checking for ltex_plus in addition to ltex here:
ltex_plus
ltex
ltex_extra.nvim/lua/ltex_extra/commands-lsp.lua
Line 55 in 24acd04
In fact, in my testing that might be the only change required?
The first change would probably be checking for ltex_plus in addition to ltex here: ltex_extra.nvim/lua/ltex_extra/commands-lsp.lua Line 55 in 24acd04 name = "ltex", In fact, in my testing that might be the only change required?
It seems so
No branches or pull requests
There is a better mantained fork of ltex-ls: https://github.com/ltex-plus/ltex-ls-plus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: