You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the idea of your project, and would like to see it move forward, even though I may not have the
time to contribute myself (or very little only).
(I have some ideas, where Lisp-Macros in a Haskell environment would come in very handy,
but don't want to take my mouth too full at this time.)
I came across your Axel language in a Haskell weekly news article / blog post on fused-effects ("[...] and the Axel programming language is built atop polysemy...")
And I had read about Alexis King's Hackett before: had watched some youtube videos etc.,
and I most say, that all in all Hackett seems more visible than Axel to me.
While it appears that Hackett is dead, cf. issue Current Status #98, it had a few more contributors at least (8 contributors on github).
Is there a chance to make Axel more visible? Maybe ask the Hackett people to add a link
to your project? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like the idea of your project, and would like to see it move forward, even though I may not have the
time to contribute myself (or very little only).
(I have some ideas, where Lisp-Macros in a Haskell environment would come in very handy,
but don't want to take my mouth too full at this time.)
I came across your Axel language in a Haskell weekly news article / blog post on fused-effects ("[...] and the Axel programming language is built atop
polysemy
...")And I had read about Alexis King's Hackett before: had watched some youtube videos etc.,
and I most say, that all in all Hackett seems more visible than Axel to me.
While it appears that Hackett is dead, cf. issue Current Status #98, it had a few more contributors at least (8 contributors on github).
Is there a chance to make Axel more visible? Maybe ask the Hackett people to add a link
to your project? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: