Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Unit Test Coverage for pkg/ Directory #4109

Open
yashpandey06 opened this issue Dec 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Improve Unit Test Coverage for pkg/ Directory #4109

yashpandey06 opened this issue Dec 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@yashpandey06
Copy link

Improve Unit Test Coverage for pkg/ Directory

Current Situation

The pkg/ directory currently has limited unit test coverage. Some critical code paths and edge cases remain untested, which could lead to undetected bugs and reduced code reliability.

Impact

The lack of comprehensive unit tests in the pkg/ directory can result in:

  1. Increased risk of regressions during future code changes.
  2. Difficulty in identifying and fixing bugs efficiently.
  3. Reduced confidence in the stability and reliability of the codebase.

Ideal Future Situation

The pkg/ directory should have robust and comprehensive unit tests that cover all critical code paths and edge cases. This would:

  1. Increase the test coverage as much as possible.
  2. Ensure that the codebase is stable and resilient to changes.
  3. Facilitate faster development and debugging by identifying issues early.

Implementation Options

  1. Audit Existing Tests: Identify gaps in the current test coverage and prioritize adding tests for untested or under-tested code.
  2. Add Unit Tests: Write detailed unit tests for each module under the pkg/ directory, covering:
    • Edge cases.
    • Common use cases.
    • Potential failure scenarios.
  3. Use Coverage Tools: Utilize tools like go test -cover to measure coverage and identify areas that need improvement.

Additional Information

  • Testing should adhere to the existing project standards and use consistent naming conventions.
  • Mocking and stubbing may be used where necessary to isolate unit tests from external dependencies.
  • Ensure that the added tests are maintainable and easy to understand.
@yashpandey06
Copy link
Author

yashpandey06 commented Dec 27, 2024

I want to propose this whole issue project to the upcoming LFX mentorship...do we have any plans regarding that ?

thanks !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant