Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create "test cases" to help users contribute to release testing #127

Open
ctubbsii opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Create "test cases" to help users contribute to release testing #127

ctubbsii opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@ctubbsii
Copy link
Member

To help with release candidate testing, and to give people a way to give feedback who may not really be familiar with Fluo, we should have some test cases documented on the website, and linked to from the releasing section of our docs.

A test case is a simple series of instructions that tells a user exactly what to do, and what should happen. It should NOT be a HOWTO or instructions on what is going on. A test case is not intended to be a teaching tool (although users running test cases) may learn something... but EXTREMELY simple step-by-step instructions that requires no thought whatsoever to follow and report back the results.

Some examples of test cases can be found here on the Fedora wiki. Two simple ones are opening PDFs in evince and verifying basic yum commands. There are other examples, but I think these two represent the idea best. One provides simple instructions for testing a GUI application, and the other for CLI. What they have in common I think best represents the idea.

Good test cases will allow people to contribute to Fluo releases without knowing anything about Fluo.

mikewalch added a commit to mikewalch/fluo-website that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2018
mikewalch added a commit to mikewalch/fluo-website that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2018
* Adding instructions for running integrations
* Will add more instructions for running example applications
@mikewalch
Copy link
Member

Can this be closed with #127 merged? Or is there more to do?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants