You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There may be more efficient ways to handle the bytes coming and going from RethinkDB than creating and parsing as strings. A few possibilities
Look at gloss :char-sequence on the codecs, and if it actually improves performance. We need to handle two types if we go this route, a java.nio.CharBuffer, and a :gloss.data.string.core/char-sequence (both are CharSequences, but the gloss one doesn't give access to the underlying array).
To encourage this: I've been looking at performance problems with clj-rethinkdb recently and from my profiling it appears that gloss.io/decode_stream is a major performance problem.
There may be more efficient ways to handle the bytes coming and going from RethinkDB than creating and parsing as strings. A few possibilities
:char-sequence
on the codecs, and if it actually improves performance. We need to handle two types if we go this route, ajava.nio.CharBuffer
, and a:gloss.data.string.core/char-sequence
(both areCharSequence
s, but the gloss one doesn't give access to the underlying array).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: