Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation on Filtering is incorrect and incomplete #46

Closed
stewartschillingsdi opened this issue Jun 26, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #93
Closed

Documentation on Filtering is incorrect and incomplete #46

stewartschillingsdi opened this issue Jun 26, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #93
Labels
accepted We've added this to our backlog

Comments

@stewartschillingsdi
Copy link
Contributor

https://developer.adobelaunch.com/api/guides/filtering/

This info is incorrect. It does not mention the use of the "EQ" operator when defining a filter.

I am told that there are other filter operators beyond just "EQ" but I do not know what they are.

I also suggest that within the "Filters" panels of filterable API responses, that a link to the filtering usage be included.

@mems
Copy link

mems commented Sep 11, 2020

It looks like there also GT, LT, LIKE, CONTAINS, NOT, STARTS WITH (but "doesn't exist at the moment")

Note: You can use multiple values as EQ foo, EQ bar, EQ some\,value\,with\,comma.
Note 2: Some endpoint support additional filtering like extensions with param max_availability (not filter[max_availability]) with possible values private, development or public)

@thebenrob thebenrob added accepted We've added this to our backlog logged labels Sep 14, 2020
@stewartschillingsdi
Copy link
Contributor Author

See also: #90

@thebenrob thebenrob removed the logged label Sep 24, 2020
@thebenrob thebenrob linked a pull request Oct 8, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted We've added this to our backlog
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants