MultiSearch

[coolnoob78]

Pre-suggestion checklist

• I have searched existing issues and didn't find any previous issues with the same suggestion.
• This is only one suggestion. I understand that GitHub issues don't work well with lists.
• This feature doesn't already exist in the latest version of Wurst. I've made sure my installation is up to date.
• I have looked at the code and am reasonably confident that this suggestion is possible to implement.

What type of improvement are you suggesting?

Adding a new hack.

What type of player would find this improvement useful?

Other (please explain in description)

Description

Search (BlockESP) is very great, however very annoying if I want to do multiple blocks. I have tried using X-Ray, not very useful. I propose we add "MultiSearch" which is Search but you can add and remove block and set the highlight color. Also make it so you can search by block tags (ex. #minecraft:stairs or #minecraft:overworld_carver_replacable) This could be very useful (ex. Easter egg huts where both player_head and player_wall_head are used, find the button with different button types, ect.)

[PlasmaHH]

I don't know where I suggested that in the past, so here it goes again: It would be useful to have the ability to have sets of blocks for the BaseFinder plugin. This would allow for various things to find/highlight like suggested for this multisearch feature, as well as providing default sets for different dimensions would also satisfy the requirements of #632 and at the same time make things more flexible ( e.g. someone could have dozens of lists for different biomes to be extra picky in base finding )

[coolnoob78]

bump

…

On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 7:13 PM github-actions[bot] < ***@***.***> wrote: This issue has been open for a while with no recent activity. If this issue is still important to you, please add a comment within the next 7 days to keep it open. Otherwise, the issue will be automatically closed to free up time for other tasks. Issues should be closed if: - They are duplicates of other issues - There is not enough demand - They are no longer relevant - There are not enough details — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#950 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BF7JORLNLB65DGI6YWDNU7LZI56FZAVCNFSM6AAAAABDP5YDPKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBVGQ2TSNBVGE> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PlasmaHH]

yes, see my comment