-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Value of 100 in B1_mean in affygw6.hmm #122
Comments
The 100 value is used there to disable the state 4 (which is copy neutral
LOH), since many users do not care about it. If you need it, you can
manually change to 0 and the prediction will be in output file.
…On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 7:35 AM isobel16 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi there,
I am attempting to train my own HMM, initialised with the parameters from
affygw6.hmm, as the array used in my data was a slight variation of this
array. However, I have noticed that in the B1_mean values:
[19] "B1_mean:"
[20] "-1.704554 -0.526063 0.000000 100.000000 0.342932 0.597818 "
The 100 value seems out of place/biologically implausible. Please could
you advise on this? Thanks!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#122>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNG3OEXH77H43HUKR5PPUD2EBCAVAVCNFSM6AAAAABTCLUV2KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSG4ZDAMRZHEYTKNY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi there, Thank you for that, that is helpful. I am attempting to retrain the HMM using signal files from my population, however I am struggling given that there are 6 values for LRR reflecting 6 states and only 5 for BAF. Could you advise on this please? |
Hi there, Apologies, just chasing this up as struggling to make any progress, and I see there is a warning on the --train option in PennCNV to train the hmm. |
Hi there,
I am attempting to train my own HMM, initialised with the parameters from affygw6.hmm, as the array used in my data was a custom Axiom array. However, I have noticed that in the B1_mean values:
[19] "B1_mean:"
[20] "-1.704554 -0.526063 0.000000 100.000000 0.342932 0.597818 "
The 100 value seems out of place/biologically implausible. Please could you advise on this?
Also, I wondered if you could clarify why there are 6 values for B1 and 5 for B2. Thanks! If you had any general advice on optimising this hmm file, as I see the --train option in the detect_cnv.pl script is not recommended for use, it would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: