You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
The code that @ted80810 wrote to fetch the COAWST model output pulls in the pathway along which we should calculate salt front location from a csv file of coordinates that was provided to us by @salme146. This pathway is close to the shore, rather than in the middle of the channel or somewhere else. I am creating this discussion to flag this and possibly have more discussion about if this is the best place to calculate salt front location.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@galengorski noted that an implicit assumption with modeling the salt front at a daily resolution for a single depth and a single location across the estuary is that within those parameters it is well mixed (or we care less about those differences).
If we are doing our own calculations of salt front location using observed specific conductance data, these observations will most likely be coming from along the shore line. So perhaps the shoreline pathway is most appropriate to use for the COAWST model output too so that we maintain consistency.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
@amsnyder:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: