-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Indicate whether plan is applicable to gateways / end devices #41
Comments
So we can keep this simple and add a We'd need to add a new boolean field to the Here is a list of frequency plans which (I think) are not relevant for gateways and hence should be have
Any others @johanstokking? |
I'll check but basically all that configure stuff other than the frequencies (and data rate for LoRa service channel) that is not already defined in another plan. So SF9 in RX2 is an example of that. Also the 6 channel roaming draft can be filtered out. It doesn't hurt for gateways to listen on all 8 channels. |
@KrishnaIyer do we need to call this new function somewhere or how we want to use it? |
Good point. The primary usecase would be the ListFrequencyPlans RPC. We can add this as an optional flag and filter out non-gateway related plans if the flag is set. Would also be great if you can add a flag to the |
@KrishnaIyer I just reread again the description and if we want to add Can you please confirm that is the case? |
Hmm I see indeed, I also overlooked this. |
I've changed the implementation and now it uses the index file. |
I've tested on Test steps:
|
Thanks a lot. Good stuff 🚀 |
Summary
For each plan we should indicate whether it's applicable to end devices and/or gateway.
What is already there? What do you see now?
In the Console you can now select both the
EU_863_870
plan and theEU_863_870_TTN
plan when registering a gateway. For gateways, these plans are equivalent, but users don't know that, which makes it confusing.What is missing? What do you want to see?
We should only show relevant plans when registering gateways / end devices.
How do you propose to implement this?
We'd need to indicate in each frequency plan (or perhaps in the index) whether the plan applies to gateways, end devices or both.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: