You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your contribution, I read your paper and said that the verification result is in a single-label dataset. Can the ML-images dataset be multi-output tested? Is it convenient to open source if there is one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Easyfeng222 Constructing a clean-annotated, large-size, same-distribution-with-training multi-labeled validation set is very very costly. We are trying to enlarge the current validation set. Please refer to Sc 4.2 for a brief illustration. We believe that the transfer learning to single-label dataset can also validate the quality of the ML-Images.
@wubaoyuan Thank you for your quick reply.the first ckpt is pre-trained with the ML-Images dictionary. Can you add a demo to use this ckpt as Single label classification.I am very interested in the demo effect of ML-images.Looking forward to your reply
Thanks for your contribution, I read your paper and said that the verification result is in a single-label dataset. Can the ML-images dataset be multi-output tested? Is it convenient to open source if there is one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: