We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To simpify diagram it would be nice to support all grouping keywords
package
node
folder
frame
cloud
database
For example in the folling diagram I commented all direct component dependecies and use grouping dependencies instead.
@startuml Architecture Diagram package ApplicationGroup { [Application] <<TheServiceName.WebApi.*>> } package DomainGroup { [Domain] <<TheServiceName.Domain.*>> [Infrastructure] <<TheServiceName.Infra.*>> [Databases] <<TheServiceName.Database.*>> } package AbstractionsGroup { [Abstractions] <<TheServiceName.Abstraction.*>> } ' These components dependencies are inferred by the package dependencies ' Application --> Databases ' Application --> Infrastructure ' Application --> Domain ApplicationGroup --> DomainGroup ' These components dependencies are inferred by the package dependencies ' Databases --> Abstractions ' Infrastructure --> Abstractions ' Domain --> Abstractions Infrastructure -> Domain DomainGroup --> AbstractionsGroup ' Infer dependencies: Because ApplicationGroup depends on DomainGroup, and DomainGroup depends on AbstractionsGroup, then ApplicationGroup depends on AbstractionsGroup ' Application --> Abstractions ' ApplicationGroup --> AbstractionsGroup @enduml
I expect:
<<...>>
A --> B
B --> C
A --> C
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
To simpify diagram it would be nice to support all grouping keywords
package
node
folder
frame
cloud
database
For example in the folling diagram I commented all direct component dependecies and use grouping dependencies instead.
I expect:
<<...>>
) defined in a group to be considered in that groupA --> B
andB --> C
impliesA --> C
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: