Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to use local LLM instead of OpenAI #57

Open
1 task done
jdisho opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Add option to use local LLM instead of OpenAI #57

jdisho opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jdisho
Copy link
Collaborator

jdisho commented Jan 21, 2025

Problem

In response to your comment - @PSchmiedmayer

--

When it comes to medical data, users may feel uncomfortable sharing this information with online providers such as OpenAI. To address privacy concerns, we should provide users with an option to opt out of using OpenAI's services. Instead, they should be able to download and use a local LLM on demand for summarisation and interpretation purposes.

Solution

The local LLM model will be available for download through the app settings. Once downloaded, users can choose between using this local model or OpenAI's services. For the sake of simplicity, we can implement a single toggle in the settings view that allows users to easily switch between these two options.

Additional context

To ensure full transparency, the active model (whether local LLM or OpenAI) should be displayed within the chat. This visual indicator helps users maintain awareness of which model is processing their data during conversations. For example, we can implement this as a subtle but noticeable indicator in the chat navigation header.

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines
@jdisho jdisho added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant