You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hei,
is there a reason you are working with hashes rather than a flattened cell index? As I understand, the domain (the box that contains the particles) is always finite and there are never indefinitely many cells. Instead of (cell.x * hashK1) + (cell.y * hashK2) + (cell.z * hashK3) you could compute the flattened index and use it as a unique cell id: cell_key = cell.z * (n_x * n_y) +cell.y *n_x + cell.x. With n_x = ceil(domain_size.x/smoothingRadius). Not sure what your domain is called, is it boundsSize?
So instead of
No reason to call KeyFromHash anymore, because all cell_key's are already smaller than tableSize (tableSize=n_x*n_y*n_z, which is smaller than numParticles).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hei,
is there a reason you are working with hashes rather than a flattened cell index? As I understand, the domain (the box that contains the particles) is always finite and there are never indefinitely many cells. Instead of (cell.x * hashK1) + (cell.y * hashK2) + (cell.z * hashK3) you could compute the flattened index and use it as a unique cell id:
cell_key = cell.z * (n_x * n_y) +cell.y *n_x + cell.x
. Withn_x = ceil(domain_size.x/smoothingRadius)
. Not sure what your domain is called, is itboundsSize
?So instead of
you could do something like:
No reason to call
KeyFromHash
anymore, because all cell_key's are already smaller thantableSize
(tableSize=n_x*n_y*n_z
, which is smaller thannumParticles
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: