Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New terms to distinguish additional URLs in a dataset #74

Open
agarny opened this issue May 4, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

New terms to distinguish additional URLs in a dataset #74

agarny opened this issue May 4, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@agarny
Copy link

agarny commented May 4, 2021

Background: we have a (simulation) dataset that contains some additional URLs (stored in dataset_description.xlsx using the Additional Links field). To distinguish those URLs, we use the corresponding information stored in the Link Description field, i.e.

Request: the above might be fine, but the information available in the Link Description field should be formalised and we would like to suggest the following terms:

  • PMR workspace;
  • CellML file;
  • SED-ML file;
  • COMBINE archive; and
  • RDF file.

@nickerso, would you agree with those terms?

@nickerso
Copy link

nickerso commented May 5, 2021

Only suggestion might be repository rather than PMR workspace.

@tgbugs - are these the datacite relationship types that you mentioned are part of the SDS 2.0: https://support.datacite.org/docs/relationtype_for_citation. And if so, these terms would be used to identify the relationship between the dataset and the resource being linked to? (rather than the current set which are more like mime-types)

@agarny
Copy link
Author

agarny commented May 5, 2021

Wouldn't repository (or Repository) be better suited to reference a whole repository as such (e.g., https://models.physiomeproject.org/)?

@nickerso
Copy link

nickerso commented May 5, 2021

a workspace is a standalone (git) repository - but you could also imagine a repository on, for example, github or biomodels. With this approach there is no technical restriction to only having models from PMR...but there is likely a curation restriction to having models from known reliable and permanent sources.

@agarny
Copy link
Author

agarny commented May 5, 2021

Oh, ok, repository as in Git repository, as opposed to Physiome Model Repository. Fair enough.

(I have updated my simulation dataset and now use Repository rather than PMR workspace for https://models.physiomeproject.org/workspace/486.)

@tgbugs
Copy link
Collaborator

tgbugs commented May 6, 2021

@nickerso yes, those are the relation types I was referring to. They function as you describe. There are also resource types and resource type general which function like the mimetypes that are used in the manifest file additional types column.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants