Weird behavior when annotating WB strains

[bandrow]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655125/
SciBot asserts that all things that look like this:
RRID:WB-STRAIN: PS4657 are actually just duplicates of this RRID:WB-STRAIN

The typesetting is correct, but there is a space in an unexpected place in this identifier.
Thoughts?

Curation did this: Assert corrected RRID for one of the tags, where the position was correct. Other unresolved tags are duplicates at this position.
Label all correct RRIDs

Another example of this behavior: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604087/
This one, curation addressed all cases because they were properly anchored.

[tgbugs]

In this case I think what I need the curators to do is add a reply to the SciBot annotations and paste the shared link to the curator provided correct annotation in the text box (@judell another use case for allowing replies to have 'exact' annotation anchoring). Nothing else should go in the reply for now, we could add a tag but the reply + shared link is enough for me to be able to sort out what is going on and find the correct anchoring when we release to public.

[bandrow]

ok Tom, I am not understanding what you mean by "curators to do is add a reply to the SciBot annotations and paste the shared link to the curator provided correct annotation in the text box"
If you want to show me what you mean on Monday, that is fine, if not then please provide an example.

[tgbugs]

Here are two images showing the steps. Turns out that this papers is not the best example because the hypothesis anchoring machinery is completely screwed up because the <a> tags screw everything up for scibot, we need to tell the typesetters that the RRID: has to bo inside the bloody tags. As a result I had to go to the api to find the correct original scibot annotation to reply to (not something we can ask the curators to do).

Here is the reply I made.
https://hyp.is/oBqDfsmVEeeirM-Xfw2W9w/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655125/

Getting the shared link to a curator reply.

Replying to the scibot annotation.