Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposition: Definition of property type of Agent (Issue #299) #320

Open
PwC-Arthur opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Proposition: Definition of property type of Agent (Issue #299) #320

PwC-Arthur opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
future-work this topic will be dealt in the future

Comments

@PwC-Arthur
Copy link
Contributor

PwC-Arthur commented Nov 8, 2023

image

@PwC-Arthur
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please be informed of the SEMIC proposition related to issue #299.

SEMIC proposition: Change the recommended controlled vocabulary to legal entity type based on GLEIF maintained by Publication Office.

We invite you to comment your approval of, or engage in discussions regarding this proposition.

This issue has two parts, the proposition concerning the editorial part can be found under issue #299.

@bertvannuffelen
Copy link
Contributor

See more information about the corresponding property in Core Business Vocabulary: https://semiceu.github.io/Core-Business-Vocabulary/releases/2.1.0/#LegalEntity%3AlegalFormType

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

jakubklimek commented Nov 21, 2023

If we are talking about the ISO 20275: Entity Legal Forms Code List there is one issue - the legal forms from various countries are not comparable. E.g. a "limited liability" company in Czechia is something different than a "limited liability" company in the UK or in Germany. Therefore, this adds precision to the information about the nature of the agent in their home country (e.g. there are more than 100 legal forms in Czechia), but this information will not be easily understood by people and machines outside of the country. Also the names of the types are only in the national language.

Example from the codelist:

"9HLU","Czechia","CZ","","","Společnost s ručením omezeným","Czech","cs"
"2HBR","Germany","DE","","","Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung","German", "de"
"Z0EY","United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland","GB","","","Limited Liability Partnership","English","en"

So I am wondering if this codelist makes sense for DCAT-AP, where we aim at Europe-wide interoperability.

@PwC-Arthur PwC-Arthur added status:resolution-proposed release:3.0.0 https://semiceu.github.io/DCAT-AP/releases/3.0.0 labels Dec 7, 2023
@jimjyang
Copy link

SEMIC proposition: Change the recommended controlled vocabulary to legal entity type based on GLEIF maintained by Publication Office.

Agree with @jakubklimek if this is the Entity Legal Forms published by the Publications Office, https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/dataset/-/resource?uri=http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/entity-legal-form.

In addition, what we need here is a type classification at a "generic level", e.g. LocalAuthority vs. NationalAuthority, rather a listing of all entity legal forms that exist in the various countries.

@bertvannuffelen bertvannuffelen added future-work this topic will be dealt in the future and removed status:resolution-proposed next-webinar release:3.0.0 https://semiceu.github.io/DCAT-AP/releases/3.0.0 labels Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
future-work this topic will be dealt in the future
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants