You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the new LArG4, there is a proliferation of saved SimEnergyDeposit collections, as shown in the image below. We have:
7 SimEnergyDeposits created directly by LArG4: 1 for the Active Volume and 6 for volumes outside the AV
3 SimEnergyDeposits created by ionandscint: 2 for the AV (one w/ and one w/o SCE) and 1 for outside the AV. The one in AV w/ SCE is already dropped.
The proposal discussed in previous meetings was to also drop the 7 SimEnergyDeposits created directly by LArG4. @jzennamo@wesketchum Shall I proceed with this?
To be done for:
SBND
ICARUS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Only thing is to verify/maybe even test that SimEdeps w/o SCE offsets can properly be used as input to ionandscint In AV/Out AV? If that is the case, then think this is perfect.
Honestly, I'd accept verbal confirmation, but if someone actually did run it through as a check even better.
With the new LArG4, there is a proliferation of saved
SimEnergyDeposit
collections, as shown in the image below. We have:SimEnergyDeposits
created directly by LArG4: 1 for the Active Volume and 6 for volumes outside the AVSimEnergyDeposits
created byionandscint
: 2 for the AV (one w/ and one w/o SCE) and 1 for outside the AV. The one in AV w/ SCE is already dropped.The proposal discussed in previous meetings was to also drop the 7
SimEnergyDeposits
created directly by LArG4. @jzennamo @wesketchum Shall I proceed with this?To be done for:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: