-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Viewing non-crosslinked peptides? #43
Comments
xiSEARCH returns (unless instructed not to) also linear peptides. One thing to keep in mind is that xiSEARCH by nature of doing a crosslink search is likely to return fewer linear matches for a given confidence then a search just for linear peptides. The reason being that the cross-linked search space is much (much) larger then the linear one. So some of the correct linear PSMs will be "covert" up by false crosslink PSMs. I.e. the correct linear match will sometimes have a lower score then an incorrect random crosslinked match and then the crosslink will be reported. On the other hand the linear search will match some crosslinked spectra incorrectly as linears. So there is a bit of an balance. |
Thanks Lutz! I found it.... thanks for your patience, I spend more time running the lab so my 'bioinformatics' is rusty, I'm more of a GUI person, that's why I amazed by your XL pipeline. I tried others, and mostly failed in the implementation due to the lack of file/data/software incompatibility and support. |
xiVIEW can be used to look at the network. If you want to look at the linear matches you can use xiSPEC (https://spectrumviewer.org/) to look at the linear only spectra (or all spectra for that matter). |
Thanks Lutz
I was caught in other projects! back to my xl samples now. All I
thought for the linear peptides was for example, when you clicked on the
nodes (proteins) in the XiView, an option where you could also see the
linear peptides which were identified for that protein, including the
modified monolinks. That would be cool to compare with the hits obtained by
'typical' proteomics programs (eg, ProteomeDiscoverer) for linear peptides
without having to open the .xlsx file produced by XiSearch with is not
friendly to browse.
Cheers!!!
Alex
…On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:45 PM Lutz Fischer ***@***.***> wrote:
xiVIEW can be used to look at the network. If you want to look at the
linear matches you can use xiSPEC (https://spectrumviewer.org/) to look
at the linear only spectra (or all spectra for that matter).
As for mining these we don't have a gui at the moment. What do you want to
look for? Maybe we can come up with something ...
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#43?email_source=notifications&email_token=AHDLPAZDEBDNCUQQ22IYKFTQJJW3LA5CNFSM4IUAAD4KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6SQUDY#issuecomment-530909711>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHDLPA24SHNFTZZ26ZESHRDQJJW3LANCNFSM4IUAAD4A>
.
|
Hi Alex,
Indeed, that would be cool. In the case of monolinks, you can do this by uploading your data to v1 of xiNET (http://crosslinkviewer.org/CLMS-CSV.php#productTypes , monolinks called "linker modified peptides" there). Unfortunately, this functionality doesn't exist in xiView as yet (Rappsilber-Laboratory/build-xiview#19). Showing the linear peptides in the expanded bars in xiNET is also a good idea. 'Showing linears in the network' or 'showing sequence coverage' has come up before, its a bit like Rappsilber-Laboratory/xiSPEC_website#18 If you upload a combination of crosslinked and linear peptides to xiView at the moment then it only loads the crosslinked ones into the interface (Rappsilber-Laboratory/build-xiview#7). I'll have a look at what can be done to improve the situation and get back to you, |
Hi Xi people!
I just run a search using the xiSearch/xiFDR/xiView pipeline.
Is there a way to see the NON cross linked peptides identified in the workflow (either in xiView or in any of the generated .xls files)? I'm 'validating' the results obtained with ProteomeDiscoverer and want to compare the data of the 'regular' peptides obtained in both searches.
Thanks!
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: