Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: where should the data prep functions live that are specific to the dashboard? #10

Closed
MonikaFu opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 8 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@MonikaFu
Copy link
Contributor

From what has been implemented so far, we're using the existing data structures that are generated by pacta.portfolio.report, however, for some plots we will need to generate new datasets because they will be new plots. Where should the functions generating those live? Should we create a new package for them?

Also - at the moment we translate the existing datasets but since for now I assume we will only have the dashboard available in English, I don't think there is a need for translations for the new charts. Do you agree @jdhoffa ?

@MonikaFu MonikaFu added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Aug 29, 2024
@AlexAxthelm
Copy link
Contributor

I would say this repo/package is the right spot for those.

@MonikaFu
Copy link
Contributor Author

MonikaFu commented Aug 30, 2024

@AlexAxthelm thanks! In principle I agree. The only problem I have with this solution is that it violates our intention to not use workflow.-type repos as packages.

@AlexAxthelm
Copy link
Contributor

🤷 All the workflow repos are packages. I think doing some reformatting of data is in-scope here (so long isn't doing the actual analysis).

@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member

jdhoffa commented Sep 3, 2024

Agree that at this stage any data preparation functions that are additional to what is required by the report should live in this repository.

We may decide at some point to refactor a utility package out of this to keep track of those function, but for now I think they are fine here

@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member

jdhoffa commented Sep 3, 2024

Also agree that at this stage, we do not need translations (although we very likely will at some point!)

@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member

jdhoffa commented Sep 3, 2024

Let me know if those answers are sufficient to close this issue

@MonikaFu
Copy link
Contributor Author

MonikaFu commented Sep 3, 2024

Sufficient, thank you @jdhoffa

@MonikaFu
Copy link
Contributor Author

MonikaFu commented Sep 3, 2024

Closing this issue given that decision has been made and we have a new issue tracking the creation of the data_prep: #11

@MonikaFu MonikaFu closed this as completed Sep 3, 2024
@github-staff github-staff deleted a comment from rodeok Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants