You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 28, 2022. It is now read-only.
However, I would expect the results not to include the second solution mapping, since the nested triple <<:Bob foaf:knows :Alice>> does not match the nested triple pattern <<?x foaf:age ?age>> .
It appears as if the query engine merely matches the "outer" triple pattern and does not consider the nested triple. Is this behavior correct according to the semantics of SPARQL*?
Hi,
I am trying to re-create the examples given in the paper [1].
I have extended the RDF* File a bit to:
Now, I am executing the SPARQL* query also provided in the paper:
When I execute the presented query over the given RDF* graph using the ExecuteSPARQLStar CLI, I obtain the following results:
However, I would expect the results not to include the second solution mapping, since the nested triple
<<:Bob foaf:knows :Alice>>
does not match the nested triple pattern<<?x foaf:age ?age>>
.It appears as if the query engine merely matches the "outer" triple pattern and does not consider the nested triple. Is this behavior correct according to the semantics of SPARQL*?
Thanks and best regards,
Lars
[1] http://olafhartig.de/files/Hartig_AMW2017_RDFStar.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: