Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistent use of the "Under Construction" header #231

Open
2 of 4 tasks
brian-rose opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

Consistent use of the "Under Construction" header #231

brian-rose opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
content Content related issue

Comments

@brian-rose
Copy link
Member

brian-rose commented Feb 21, 2022

The issue

There are lots of places in Pythia Foundations where there's a prominent Under Construction disclaimer. These are relics from the early days when we laid out section headings before merging in actual content.

As Foundations reaches young adulthood, I think it's time to review the remaining headers and use them consistently. It's fine to leave them in places where we are clearly planning to develop some new content. But we should clean these up where they no longer serve a purpose.

Places where the header should be removed because the content is mature

Places where the header should stay (for now) because we are clearly missing content

Places where I'm not sure whether more content is planned or not:

@brian-rose brian-rose added the content Content related issue label Feb 21, 2022
@brian-rose
Copy link
Member Author

#272 removes the "Advanced GitHub Topics" page, since we currently have no plans for populating this.

@brian-rose
Copy link
Member Author

brian-rose commented Apr 28, 2022

#248 addresses the Markdown page

@brian-rose
Copy link
Member Author

It would be great to revisit this during our latest content push prior to AGU 2022.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Content related issue
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants