-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using updated nanopore flowcells for Arabidopsis ? #20
Comments
Hi Jeremy, Thank you for your interest of our tool! Currently the trained model is only compatible with R9.4 data. We now don't have a model for R10.4 flowcell, because we haven't got any R10.4 reads that can be used for training yet. Best, |
Dear Peng, Thanks for the quick answer. Best , Jeremy |
Hello DeepSignal-Plant Authors, Following up on this thread, I wonder if there is a plan in the near future to include R10 models? We have some grapevine sequencing data, that we would like to call methylation from. |
Hi @yusmiatiliau , thank you very much for your interest of our tool. I want to, but we don't have a plan in the near future to include R10 models. We don't have any R10 data yet. Maybe in the future we will have a R10 model, but not in the near future. Best regards, |
@yusmiatiliau , @JBerthelier , Hi all, very sorry for the delay! Our tool deepsignal3 supports R10.4.1 POD5 format now. Please check the deepsignal3 repo for more details if you are still interested. Best, |
Dear DeepSignal authors,
Thanks for this great tool !
I was wondering if we can use R10.4 flowcell or is it better to use R9.4 for Arabidopsis methylation calling ? (I was using R9.4)
I see that the trained model was obtained with R9.4 .
Best regards,
Jeremy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: