[ci skip] Implement renovate and remove dependabot #130
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Doc94
changed the title
|
Thanks! Can you rebase off the |
Doc94
force-pushed
the
change/dependa-to-renovate
branch
from
cbfa162
to
c563db6
Compare
i reset to the another branch and make the changes base in this, moving the file to .github (mostly like a standar based in how dependabot has the config in this directory) and change the target of the PR. |
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/configure
branch
from
fc883a2
to
f659c04
Compare
|
this changes are still need or wanna keep the default renovate config? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mentioned by riley in discord, this PR remove the dependabot config and implement the configuration for renovate.
In concradiction to #129 this PR try to migrate the configuration in dependabot, testing with a validator founded in google...
i think i cannot test this in forks... but based in docs can work.