You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@john-p-ryan has done good work on how to allow one to use a KDE to smooth the bottom part of the earnings distribution and be able to pair that with a Pareto distribution for the upper tail.
We should implement this as a viable method in the compute_income_dist method. A more consistent estimate of the upper part of the distribution (which has few observations) will help to get more informative estimates of the social welfare weights.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@john-p-ryan: Per our conversation yesterday about fitting a joint log-normal and Pareto distribution, here's a picture that replicates Figure 2 from Saez (2001) with the CPS data on wages and salaries we used, grown out to 2023 values:
And the figure from Saez:
It would appear to me that our estimates of the Pareto parameter for the tail of the distribution would be an $\alpha\approx 1.9$ and that our cutoff value for the tail would be in the $150,00-$200,000 range.
@john-p-ryan has done good work on how to allow one to use a KDE to smooth the bottom part of the earnings distribution and be able to pair that with a Pareto distribution for the upper tail.
We should implement this as a viable method in the
compute_income_dist
method. A more consistent estimate of the upper part of the distribution (which has few observations) will help to get more informative estimates of the social welfare weights.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: