Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent Naming Convention for Storage Location Constants #140

Open
nicolasgarcia214 opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Inconsistent Naming Convention for Storage Location Constants #140

nicolasgarcia214 opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@nicolasgarcia214
Copy link

The storage location constants currently have a different naming style compared to other constants in the library. For example, a typical constant in the library is named like TYPE_HASH, following the uppercase snake case convention. However, the storage location constants are not adhering to this pattern.

Some examples are:
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nicolasgarcia214