-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Archive nightly builds #12
Comments
Hello, it would be possible, but it would require reworking the build script and, what is more important, I believe it would spam the repo quite a lot with many builds that would never be used even a single time. I think if you need to look, let's say 3 months back, link Pharo to local git repository (or repositories, if the same is needed for more than just OP core) then checkout older commit. What certainly is true that the actual releases are very outdated and the frequency should be heavily increased. |
Yeah, I guess it's true there would be a lot of them. I know you can set the workflow to just create a build on every commit/push, so the archived builds would be "hidden" in CI section of each commit, which would still definitely be helpful, but it's not ideal when there are so many dependencies which are all changing between each commit (or especially after the fact), and I'm not even sure how it would be implemented in a project spanning multiple repos. Larger projects usually have some sort of artifacts storage for that (such as VLC's), so the nightly builds and releases are clearly separated, but I don't really assume that is within the realms of possibility here. |
I have gone the most simple-yet-sufficient route of publishing the files here on GitHub, but having separate pre-release for every commit would create too many of them I think. |
Hmm, yeah, I understand. Would it perhaps work to have a separate repo to store the nightly builds in (as a set of "versioned" files for each build) ( |
Unfortunately, storing large amount of large files using git is generally not very good idea. It requires using LFS and GitHub.com could actually require making the total repo size smaller. It is not that much of a problem when storing files as part of releases. |
Well, I believe I remember seeing a repo like this, but I can't remember the details. However, does that mean that having a repo where the builds would be archived as releases would work? |
I believe it might. Best solution would be a proper deployment storage / content delivery system with filtering by release type etc., but that would require money, time or both and there is not much of either :D |
Would it be possible to archive the nightly builds somehow? Not only are the actual releases long outdated, without having easy access to all the different version over time, it is actually really hard to figure out when exactly something broke (e.g. #11).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: