You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Peak detection usually leads to peaks with more than 100 mass traces. This is fine, but may become a problem for targeted search using the Template Peak Detector. #57 opened the opportunity to use an arbitrary number of m/z values to gain more comprehensive scans.
I request a Peak Filter to reduce the number of mass traces in the Scan Table based on the sum of Intensity [%].
The sum of Intensity [%] does not exist for now, but would provides an objecitve information on the comprehensiveness of a scan. Using 99 % as theshold for the sum of intensity [%], mass traces could be reduced to a reasonable number, still representing the peak/scan very well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Peak detection usually leads to peaks with more than 100 mass traces. This is fine, but may become a problem for targeted search using the Template Peak Detector. #57 opened the opportunity to use an arbitrary number of m/z values to gain more comprehensive scans.
I request a Peak Filter to reduce the number of mass traces in the Scan Table based on the sum of Intensity [%].
The sum of Intensity [%] does not exist for now, but would provides an objecitve information on the comprehensiveness of a scan. Using 99 % as theshold for the sum of intensity [%], mass traces could be reduced to a reasonable number, still representing the peak/scan very well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: