Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip-Wake-Words Support in Intent Service #182

Open
6 tasks
NeonDaniel opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
6 tasks

Skip-Wake-Words Support in Intent Service #182

NeonDaniel opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
feature New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@NeonDaniel
Copy link
Member

NeonDaniel commented Dec 10, 2021

Objective

Allow intent handling based on matched intent or presence of an "activation word" in an input utterance.

Initial Implementation Goals

  • Add user preference to default allow or deny intent handling without an activation word (when SWW)
  • Handle configured whitelisted intents that can be called without requiring an activation word (when SWW)
  • Handle configured blacklisted intents that cannot be called unless an activation word is present (when SWW)
  • Optionally add decorator for intents to declare default behavior?
  • Optionally implement an audio parser to detect a wake word in recorded speech
  • Implement a text parser to detect a configurable wake word in transcribed speech (maybe just a voc_match plugin)
@NeonDaniel NeonDaniel added the feature New feature or request label Dec 10, 2021
@NeonDaniel NeonDaniel added the question Further information is requested label May 16, 2024
@NeonDaniel NeonDaniel moved this to Low Priority in Community Projects May 16, 2024
@NeonDaniel
Copy link
Member Author

Consider rolling into user auth.
Also depends on NeonGeckoCom/neon_speech#41

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: Low Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant