You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since we already have an integrated one (i.e., fcadet_arag_100), I'm not sure if we still want to keep those diagnostic variables. Any suggestions are welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @yichengt900, @feida6996, I'm sorry I missed this when it was raised. We definitely do want to maintain 3D sinking flux diagnostics. I wasn't aware that we were having a problem with this. There is a somewhat cryptic note above this that seems to provide an explanation, but I'm not sure that I follow it. Do you have any output that illustrates the problem?
Hi @charliestock and @yichengt900, the issue occurs only when writing out the 3D diagnostics. If the axis dimensions aren't fixed, the model won't start, so there's no outputs to compare. Once I fixed the axis dimensions, the model runs fine and outputs are generated. Correcting the axis dimension in cobalt_reg_diag.F90 should resolve this without affecting the model results.
Currently, the 3D sinking diagnostic variables aren't working because the axis dimensions were not set correctly (thanks to @feida6996).
Incorrect Axis Dimensions Set for 3D Sinking Flux Diagnostic Variables
Since we already have an integrated one (i.e., f
cadet_arag_100
), I'm not sure if we still want to keep those diagnostic variables. Any suggestions are welcome.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: