Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nif:AnnotationUnit vs nifs:Annotation vs fise:EntityAnnotation vs fam:EntityAnnotation #19

Open
VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Mar 24, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Contributor

@kurzum "do you also agree to merge nifs:Annotation from https://github.com/NLP2RDF/ontologies/blob/master/nif-core/nif-stanbol.ttl#L78 into nif-core and rename it AnnotationUnit ? We really need the feature to express basic alternative annotations."

Such node is definitely needed. But let's examine "prior art". in chronological order I think it is:

  1. FISE (Stanbol): http://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/enhancementstructure.html
  2. http://jens-lehmann.org/files/2013/iswc_nif.pdf fig.3, which uses FISE
  3. NIF Stanbol: http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/specification/stanbol.html, incl nifs:Annotation
  4. FAM (Fusepool P3): https://github.com/fusepoolP3/overall-architecture/blob/master/wp3/fp-anno-model/fp-anno-model.md

2 is contradicted by 3, eg

2 3
nif:EntityAnnotation fise:EntityAnnotation
nifs:extractedFrom fise:extracted-from
nif:oliaConf fise:confidence

But I guess 2 is older and 3 is current.

I don't know if someone has used 3 (NIF Stanbol). Multisensor hasn't.

I'd be happy if you consolidate all this into AnnotationUnit and friends.
KEY QUESTION: I guess that with NIF 2.1, the Stanbol profile will go away?

Ideally and if possible, this should be coordinated with the FAM people, but I don't know any of them...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant