Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parameters for Cambridge Neurotech Acute 32-channel probe on kilosort4 #831

Open
AmaliaLambertRinguet opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@AmaliaLambertRinguet
Copy link

Hi there!
I'm soliciting your help to adjust the default settings on kilosort4, for a Cambridge Neurotech Acute 32-channel probe : the ASSY-37 Fb (3 shanks).
ASSY-37-Fb (1)
After running the spike sorting algorithm, we obtain all the .npy and the .tsv files, the diagnostics, drift-amount and spike-positions but the default parameters don't seem to suit. We changed the "nblocks" = 0, as recommanded for probes with less than 64 channels.
image
image

@jacobpennington
Copy link
Collaborator

What about the results didn't look right? Also, please upload kilosort4.log from the results directory.

@AmaliaLambertRinguet
Copy link
Author

AmaliaLambertRinguet commented Dec 16, 2024

Look at the duration of the spikes (normally ranges between 0.5 and 2 ms, and actually where we record between 0.5 and 1.5 ms), seen in the waveforms in the "Temporal Features" (with time in seconds!) :
image
In my opinion, these are likely due to artifacts or issues with spike detection and sorting. I'm trying to adjust parameters such as "whitening_range", "highpass_cutoff", "nt0min" or "duplicate spike ms", that's why I would very much like to have the suggestions of someone who's worked with this kind of probe or faced similar issues.

Here is the kilosort4.log file :
kilosort4.log

Thanks for your help!

@jacobpennington
Copy link
Collaborator

That graph is not showing spikes, it's showing PC features extracted from single-channels spikes, and that looks like a normal set. I would suggest looking at the results in Phy to get a better idea of what the KS4 results look like, using the default parameters.

@AmaliaLambertRinguet
Copy link
Author

That graph is not showing spikes, it's showing PC features extracted from single-channels spikes, and that looks like a normal set. I would suggest looking at the results in Phy to get a better idea of what the KS4 results look like, using the default parameters.

Oh okay, thank you!
Actually, I posted another issue about Phy (cortex-lab/phy#1319). I probably have a problem with Python that keeps me from visualising the results...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants