You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One way to test the shallow surface hypothesis would be to compare the energy trace during the geometry optimization.
Or you could use constraint minimizations. We are computing strain energy using a combination of conformational sampling and constraint minimization that allow to see how shallow the surface is around the starting point:
Lee, Man-Ling, Ignacio Aliagas, Jianwen A. Feng, Thomas Gabriel, T. J. O’Donnell, Benjamin D. Sellers, Bernd Wiswedel, and Alberto Gobbi. “Chemalot and Chemalot_knime: Command Line Programs as Workflow Tools for Drug Discovery.” Journal of Cheminformatics 9 (June 12, 2017): 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0228-9.
I think the original work is by Bostroem:
Boström J, Norrby PO, Liljefors T (1998) Conformational energy penalties
of protein-bound ligands. J Comput Aided Mol Des 12(4):383–396
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From Alberto Gobbi:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: