Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor the references of project everywhere and rename "algorithm system(s)" to "algorithm(s)" #326

Closed
robbertbos opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #359 · May be fixed by #368
Closed

Refactor the references of project everywhere and rename "algorithm system(s)" to "algorithm(s)" #326

robbertbos opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #359 · May be fixed by #368
Assignees

Comments

@robbertbos
Copy link
Member

robbertbos commented Oct 28, 2024

Description

Before the demo, there was a request to change at least any visible mentions of projects to the algorithm system. In the UI, everything is changed, but technically, everything is still called project(s).

Based on the feedback we received during the first demos, we realized that algorithm systems would result in people asking questions about what we mean precisely with an algorithm system. Although algorithm is too narrow, it will be a better match. It will align with "Algoritmekader" and "Algoritmeregister".

Implementation notes

  • Rename "algorithm system(s)" to "algorithm(s)": routing, breadcrumps, info on pages, create algorithm page, etc.
  • Refactor code base and model to use "algorithm(s)" instead of "project(s)"

Remark: With this change we have an algorithm with a systemcard with algorithms. This flow needs to be fixed.

@robbertbos robbertbos converted this from a draft issue Oct 28, 2024
@berrydenhartog berrydenhartog self-assigned this Nov 8, 2024
@berrydenhartog berrydenhartog linked a pull request Nov 13, 2024 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👷 In Progress to ✅ Done in 👾 AI Validation Team Planning Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 👀 In Review
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants